History
  • No items yet
midpage
Silcott v. Dahlberg
550 N.E.2d 477
Ohio
1990
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The motion to dismiss is sustained and the cause is dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents.





Dissenting Opinion

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I would not grant bail, but I dissent from the dismissal of this cause because habeas corpus is the proper remedy to establish, if appropriate, post-conviction bail. See, generally, In re DeFronzo (1977), 49 Ohio St. 2d 271, 3 O.O. 3d 408, 361 N.E. 2d 448. I would remand this cause to the court of appeals for a Crim. R. 46 bail determination.

Case Details

Case Name: Silcott v. Dahlberg
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 21, 1990
Citation: 550 N.E.2d 477
Docket Number: No. 89-1680
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.