History
  • No items yet
midpage
49 Ohio St. 3d 51
Ohio
1990

Lead Opinion

The motion to dismiss is sustained and the cause is dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents.





Dissenting Opinion

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I would not grant bail, but I dissent from the dismissal of this cause because habeas corpus is the proper remedy to establish, if appropriate, post-conviction bail. See, generally, In re DeFronzo (1977), 49 Ohio St. 2d 271, 3 O.O. 3d 408, 361 N.E. 2d 448. I would remand this cause to the court of appeals for a Crim. R. 46 bail determination.

Case Details

Case Name: Silcott v. Dahlberg
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 21, 1990
Citations: 49 Ohio St. 3d 51; 550 N.E.2d 477; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 75; No. 89-1680
Docket Number: No. 89-1680
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In