History
  • No items yet
midpage
Silberberg v. M. Ascher Silk Corp.
208 A.D. 766
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1924
|
Check Treatment
Clarke, P. J.

(dissenting):

The verdict, in my opinion, was clearly against the weight of the evidence. Furthermore, plaintiff having sued for $25,000, and the court having charged at the request of plaintiff’s counsel that if the jury behoved the plaintiff’s story and plaintiff’s witnesses they might find a verdict for the plaintiff for $6,615, besides interest, and the jury having returned a verdict for $2,500, there is no basis in the evidence for such a finding, and it was evidently a compromise verdict. I, therefore, dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial.

Case Details

Case Name: Silberberg v. M. Ascher Silk Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 15, 1924
Citation: 208 A.D. 766
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.