107 Iowa 128 | Iowa | 1898
IV. It is suggested that, because the herd law was not shown to have been in force, the defendant was not required to restrain her stock. In other words, she might
Y. The errors in the record appear to have arisen from the assumption that-the defendant had been shown to be the •owner of the land during the season of 1894, and that the plaintiff, in what he did, -was a mere trespasser. As we have seen, the evidence did not warrant these conclusions — • —Reversed.