History
  • No items yet
midpage
Siekierda v. Commonwealth
563 Pa. 521
| Pa. | 2000
|
Check Treatment
762 A.2d 1085 (2000)

John W. SIEKIERDA, Appellee,
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

December 22, 2000.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, the order of the common pleas court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. McCafferty, ___ Pa. ___, 758 A.2d 1155 (2000), and Harrington v. Commonwealth, ___ Pa. ___, 763 A.2d 386 (2000).

Justice CAPPY files a concurring statement.

CAPPY, Justice, concurring.

I join the per curiam reversal and remand for the reasons set forth more fully in my concurring opinion in Harrington v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., ___ Pa. ___, 763 A.2d 386 (2000).

Case Details

Case Name: Siekierda v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 22, 2000
Citation: 563 Pa. 521
Docket Number: Appeal 65 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 2000
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.