History
  • No items yet
midpage
Siegel v. State
274 So. 2d 9
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1973
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The appellant was charged by information with breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit grand larceny and assaulting a person therein, and in a second count with assault and battery. Trial was held before a jury. The defendant was found guilty on the first count and acquitted on the second. On this appeal therefrom by the defendant, the several contentions presented for reversal have been considered in the light of the record, briefs and argument and are found to be without merit. The assignment of error relied on for appellant’s contention of insufficiency of the evidence is directed to the verdict, rather than to the judgment. However, the record discloses the verdict and judgment were supported by competent substantial evidence. Error is not shown in relation to the jury charges given by the court. In the circumstances of the case the defendant’s motion for mistrial was properly denied.

No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Siegel v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 6, 1973
Citation: 274 So. 2d 9
Docket Number: No. 72-848
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.