Siebold v. Zieboldt

93 N.J. Eq. 500 | N.J. | 1922

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for- the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin. - ■ ■•• •

For .affirmance — Ti-ie Ci-iief-Just-IGE, Swayze, TrencHard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbagh, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.
midpage