Sickley Brothers v. Michel Moore Company
109 N.J.L. 348
| N.J. | 1932

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.