History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sibley v. Hoar
70 Mass. 222
| Mass. | 1855
|
Check Treatment
Thomas, J.

Of the construction given to the written contract, the defendants have no ground of complaint, and the plaintiffs make none.

The matters of damage submitted to the jury were too contingent and remote.

The plaintiffs can take judgment for nominal damages, or a New trial in the cou/rt of common pleas.

The plaintiffs elected to take judgment for nominal damages.

Case Details

Case Name: Sibley v. Hoar
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1855
Citation: 70 Mass. 222
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.