History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shull v. State
130 P. 910
Okla.
1913
Check Treatment

This is an appeal from an order of the county court of Custer county, dismissing an appeal from the final action of the treasurer of that county, finding that certain personal property belonging to the plaintiff in error had been unlawfully omitted from the tax returns for certain years.

In State et al. v. Cawthorn's Estate, 31 Okla. 560,122 P. 522, it was held that "the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction to review, on appeal thereto, an order or judgment of a county court made in an appeal to such court from a decision and order of a county treasurer, assessing property for taxation, alleged to have been unlawfully omitted from the tax returns for certain years."

On the authority of the foregoing case, the appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

WILLIAMS, DUNN and TURNER, JJ., concur; HAYES, C. J., absent, and not participating. *Page 589

Case Details

Case Name: Shull v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Mar 11, 1913
Citation: 130 P. 910
Docket Number: 2421
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.