History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shuey v. Wolf
107 So. 2d 195
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1958
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This was an action brought by the appellant, a registered real estate broker, to recover the sum of $50,736 as a commission for services claimed to have been rendered by him in finding a purchaser ready, willing, and able to buy on terms accepta*196ble to appellee, which offer appellee refused to accept.

Both parties sought judgment through summary proceeding. Their respective motions were supported by affidavits and depositions. The trial court granted the motion of appellee for summary judgment, in consequence of which he entered judgment for appellee. Basically, the court’s position was that there was no genuine issue of any material fact on question of liability of ap-pellee on the cause of action stated; that there had been no complete listing of the property; and that, as a matter of law, appellant had not found a purchaser ready, able and willing to buy on terms acceptable or agreed to by appellee. In this connection see the case of McAllister Hotel, Inc. v. Porte, Fla.1957, 98 So.2d 781.

We do not find from the record that the trial judge erred in entering summary judgment for appellee. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

KANNER, C. J., SHANNON, J., and PARKS, L. L., Associate Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Shuey v. Wolf
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 10, 1958
Citation: 107 So. 2d 195
Docket Number: No. 421
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.