History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shoffner v. Mann
251 N.C. 462
N.C.
1959
Check Treatment
PeR Curiam.

Attention is called to the fact the suit is against the brokers who negotiated the insurance contract and not -against, the Virginia Mutual Insurance Company, the insurer. The right to cancel -is reserved to the insurer. The right to cancel being conceded, it appears any cause of action would be limited to the recovery of the unearned premium. The plaintiff’s evidence -showed he had received credit on another policy for the full amount due him. The plaintiff’s own evidence, therefore, put him out of court.

The judgment of nonsuit is

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Shoffner v. Mann
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Dec 16, 1959
Citation: 251 N.C. 462
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.