History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shober v. Cochrane
53 Md. 544
Md.
1880
Check Treatment
By the Court :

In this case the order of the Circuit Court refusing the writ of mandamus will he affirmed ; this Court being of opinion that under the Acts of 1872, ch. 377, sub-ch. 3, sec. 4, and 1874, ch. 463, sub-ch. 3, sec. 4, the power to decide the matter in dispute, was vested in the State Board of Education, and that its decision thereon was final and conclusive. Wiley, et al. vs. Board of County School Commissioners of Allegany County, 51 Md., 401, appears to us to dispose of this question. It may not be out of place to say, after an examination of the question, that in our opinion, the decision by the State Board of Education in this case upon the merits was correct, and if we had jurisdiction to review it, would be affirmed.

Robinson, J., dissented on the question of the jurisdiction of the State Board of Education.

Case Details

Case Name: Shober v. Cochrane
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Date Published: Apr 1, 1880
Citation: 53 Md. 544
Court Abbreviation: Md.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.