Case Information
*1 Case 1:20-cv-00550-ARR-MMH Document 65 Filed 12/29/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 3048
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MAHESH SHETTY,
20-CV-550 (ARR) (MMH) Plaintiffs Opinion & Order — against — Not for electronic or print SG BLOCKS, INC. and PAUL GALVIN, publication Defendants.
ROSS, United States District Judge: This Court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated December 6, 2021 from the Honorable Marcia M. Henry, United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’ s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth. , No. 09-CV-874 (CBA)(LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011), aff’d , 472 F. App’x 73 (2d Cir. 2012) (summary order). Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax , No. 17-CV-0371 (LDH)(LB), 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd. , 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, I deny parties’ Motion for Settlement without prejudice and with leave to renew. Parties are directed to submit a revised motion, as well as a revised and fully executed agreement by January 3, 2022. SO ORDERED.
*2 Case 1:20-cv-00550-ARR-MMH Document 65 Filed 12/29/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3049 _______/s/________________ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge
Dated: December 29, 2021 Brooklyn, New York 2