History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sherrod v. State
915 S.W.2d 795
Mo. Ct. App.
1996
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Nathan Sherrod pled guilty to the Class B felony of sale of a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.211, RSMo 1994. He was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to a term of imprisonment of seven years. He filed a Rule 24.035 motion to vacate the judgment and sentence, which was denied as untimely. Mr. Sherrod appeals, contending that the 90-day time limit for filing a motion under Rule 24.035 violates his due process rights because it arbitrarily denies him reasonable access to post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 84.16. In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Sherrod v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 20, 1996
Citation: 915 S.W.2d 795
Docket Number: No. WD 51032
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.