Sherman v. Blodgett
28 Vt. 149 | Vt. | 1855
We have no doubt the evidence objected to was properly admitted.
The solvency of an individual is a matter resting somewhat in opinion ; and, in the present case, the witness had stated what property the bail owned at the time he entered bail, and his means of knowing the situation and circumstances of the bail; certainly there could then be no objection to his giving his opinion from his knowledge of the bail, and of his affairs, what he thought he was worth.
Judgment affirmed.