midpage

Sherlock v. SherlockSherlock v. Sherlock

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Feb 2, 1981
No. WW-292
Versions:396 So. 2d 196
1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20246

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., and WOODIE A. LILES (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.





Rehearing

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The wife moves for rehearing on this Court’s per curiam affirmance of her cross-appeal in this cause. Since the record reveals that arrangements, short of partition, could be worked out for the wife to purchase the husband’s remaining equity in the marital home, we are unable to find an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Motion for Rehearing is DENIED.

McCORD and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., and LILES, WOODIE A. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Sherlock v. Sherlock
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 2, 1981
Citations: 396 So. 2d 196; 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20246; No. WW-292
Docket Number: No. WW-292
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In