History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sherl v. Ladman
259 A.D. 810
N.Y. App. Div.
1940
Check Treatment

The so-called newly-discovered evidence was insufficient to justify the court in setting aside the judgment which was rendered in favor of plaintiff. Under the circumstances, order, granting the motions of the defendants to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence, reversed, with costs and disbursements, and the judgment reinstated. Present —■ Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents and votes to affirm. [See 254 App. Div. 730.]

Case Details

Case Name: Sherl v. Ladman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 19, 1940
Citation: 259 A.D. 810
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.