History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sherl v. Ladman
254 A.D. 730
N.Y. App. Div.
1938
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We believe that there was ample evidence in the record to sustain the verdict in the sum of $2,500, with interest against the defendants. It was improper, therefore, for the court at Trial Term to order a new trial “ unless the plaintiff files with tMs court within ten days after the service of a copy of tMs order with notice of entry thereof, a stipulation consenting to reduce the said verdict to the sum of $600.”

Plaintiff’s intestate parted with her money upon the fraudulent representations of the defendants. The item of $600, to wMeh reference has been made by the trial court, was merely one of the fraudulent elements wMch was employed for the purpose of carrying out the conspiracy to obtain the full amount wMeh the jury awarded to the plaintiff.

The order should be reversed, with costs, and the verdict reinstated.

Present —■ Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with costs and disbursements, and the verdict reinstated.

Case Details

Case Name: Sherl v. Ladman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 27, 1938
Citation: 254 A.D. 730
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.