History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sheppard v. . Sheppard
4 N.C. 545
N.C.
1817
Check Treatment

The ancestors of the lessors of the plaintiffs did not derive any title from the patentee, or from any person claiming under him. They claim by virtue of a deed made and executed to their ancestor by a certain B. Sheppard, dated in May, 1792. It is admitted by the case that neither their ancestor, in his lifetime, nor themselves since his death, have had a seven years continued possession of the premises in question; and we are therefore of opinion that the deed of 1792, accompanied with a possession short of seven years, did not ripen into such a title as authorizes the present lessors of the plaintiffs to recover in this action.

Judgment for defendant.

NOTE. — See Jones v. Ridley, ante, 280, and the note to Strudwickv. Shaw, 1 N.C. 34, and to the same case in 2 N.C. 5.

Cited: Duncan v. Duncan, 25 N.C. 318; Taylor v. Gooch, 48 N.C. 468;Gudger v. Hensley, 82 N.C. 483. *Page 397

(547)

Case Details

Case Name: Sheppard v. . Sheppard
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 5, 1817
Citation: 4 N.C. 545
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.