History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shepherd v. . Refining Company
153 S.E. 927
N.C.
1930
Check Treatment

Civil action to enforce specific performance of an alleged contract to sell land.

There was judgment of nonsuit, and the plaintiff appeals. The nonsuit was entered on the theory that the plaintiff had failed to show a contract in writing, or any memorandum or *Page 825 note thereof, signed by the party to be charged therewith, or by some other person by him thereto lawfully authorized, which described the property with sufficient definiteness to admit of identification as required by C. S., 988. In this we find no error

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Shepherd v. . Refining Company
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: May 21, 1930
Citation: 153 S.E. 927
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.