History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shenk v. Commonwealth
26 Va. App. 252
Va. Ct. App.
1997
Check Treatment

By opinion dated June 3, 1997, a majority of a panel of this Court affirmed the decision of the trial court. Shenk v. Commonwealth, 24 Va.App. 816, 485 S.E.2d 669 (1997). Upon motion of Carson Ray Shenk, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted a hearing en banc. Upon such rehearing, the stay of this Court’s June 3, 1997 mandate is lifted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for those reasons set forth in the panel’s majority opinion.

Judge Benton, with whom Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Coleman and Elder join, would reverse the judgment of the trial court for those reasons set forth in the panel’s dissenting opinion. See id. at 820-22,485 S.E.2d at 671-72.

The Commonwealth shall recover of the appellant an additional fee of $200 for services rendered by the Public Defender on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel’s costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses. This amount shall be added to the costs due the Commonwealth in the June 3,1997 mandate.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.

Case Details

Case Name: Shenk v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Dec 30, 1997
Citation: 26 Va. App. 252
Docket Number: Record No. 1165-96-4
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.