History
  • No items yet
midpage
104 So. 3d 1238
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2012
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 291 (Fla.2003) (“Collateral estoppel ... precludes a defendant from rearguing in a successive rule 3.800 motion the same issue argued in a prior motion.”); see also Bradley v. State, 3 So.3d 1168, 1168 (Fla.2009).

GRIFFIN, LAWSON and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Shelton v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 21, 2012
Citations: 104 So. 3d 1238; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21961; 2012 WL 6629614; No. 5D12-4177
Docket Number: No. 5D12-4177
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In