History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sheldon v. Hoffnagle
4 N.Y.S. 287
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1889
Check Treatment
Ingalls, J.

The decision by the court at special term was quite as favorable to the plaintiff as the facts and law would warrant, and the judgment entered in the action should be affirmed, with costs. The reasons assigned by the learned justice who tried the action as they appear in his opinion, are so far satisfactory as to render it unnecessary to further discuss the questions involved. 27either the facts nor the law establish in favor of the plaintiff any right or equity superior to that which the judgment herein secures to her. All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Sheldon v. Hoffnagle
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 7, 1889
Citation: 4 N.Y.S. 287
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.