History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shelby Iron Co. v. Bean
1922 Ala. LEXIS 443
| Ala. | 1922
|
Check Treatment

This is the second appeal in the course of the litigation. Shelby Iron Co. v. Bean, 203 Ala. 79, 82 So. 93. A satisfactory statement of the case there appears.

Of the errors assigned there is in the brief for appellant sufficient insistence to invoke review upon only one assignment, viz. that predicated of the action of the court in overruling appellant's demurrer to the amended count A, drawn to state a cause of action under subdivision 1, § 3910, Code. The amended count described the defect alleged as consisting of a defective furnace stack, thereby, after reversal on formal appeal, removing the fault that (on original consideration) was found to affect the count. After the amendment stated the count was not too general in respect of efficient description of the defect averred. The cases cited on brief for appellant do not invite a different conclusion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Shelby Iron Co. v. Bean
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Oct 26, 1922
Citation: 1922 Ala. LEXIS 443
Docket Number: 7 Div. 335.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.