History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sheffield v. Sheffield
38 Ga. App. 685
Ga. Ct. App.
1928
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

1. The court did not err in refusing to continue the case because of the absence of a witness who had not been subpoenaed (Civil Code (1910), § 5715) ; the evidence supports the verdict; and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

2. The request for an award of damages under the Civil Code (1910), § 6213, because it is contended that the case was taken up for delay only, is denied. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworlh. J.. concur. IK. I. Geer, for plaintiff in error. P. B. Rich, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Sheffield v. Sheffield
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 13, 1928
Citation: 38 Ga. App. 685
Docket Number: 19133
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.