40 P. 679 | Ariz. | 1895
(after stating the facts).—The first thing to claim our attention, presented by the record in this ease, is the proclamation of election. Counsel for appellant contend that as it was stated in the_ proclamation of election that three supervisors were to be elected, it was the duty of appellee to place the names of the three persons nominated on the ballots as candidates for supervisors; that the proclamation, per se, fixed the number to be elected. It will only be necessary for us to consider a proclamation of election far enough to dispose of the 'above contention. We have the following statutes with reference to elections, viz.: “There shall be held throughout the territory, upon the Tuesday after the first Monday in November, A. D. 1888, and every two years thereafter, an election for members of the legislative assembly and such other officers as may be required by law to be chosen at such election, to be called the ‘general election.’ ” Rev. Stats., par. 1588. “Special elections shall only be held to fill the vacancies in the offices of members of the legislature or delegate to Congress, on the proclamation of the governor for that purpose.” Rev. Stats., par. 1589. Two kinds of elections have been established,—viz., general elections and special elections. Special elections can only be held to fill vacancies in the office of members of the legislature or delegate to Congress. No other officers can be chosen at such election, and they can only be held on the proclamation of the governor for that purpose. It is further provided by law as follows: “At least thirty days before a general election and at least ten
It is provided that special elections to fill vacancies occurring in certain offices may be held “on the proclamation of the governor for that purpose ” General elections occur at fixed periods, and for the election of the officers to take the places of those whose terms expire by operation of law. Special elections are held for the election of officers to places made vacant by the occurrenr / of some unexpected event,— something which may occur without becoming generally
The only other question presented by the record is as to the length of time for which Finley was appointed. “An office becomes vacant on the happening of either of the following •events before the expiration of the term: (1) The death of the incumbent. ...” Rev. Stats., par. 3111. It is the term that becomes vacant. Id. “Any person elected or appointed to fill a vacancy, after filing his official oath and bond, where a bond is required, possesses all the rights and powers and is subject to all the liabilities, duties, and obligations of the officer whose vacancy he fills.” Rev. Stats., par. 3116. 'The person appointed to fill an office made vacant, after qualifying, possesses all the rights, etc., of the officer whose place he takes. That which is surrendered by the one is gained or .acquired by the other. The one loses the office for the remaining or unexpired portion of the term, and the other acquires, by appointment, that which is surrendered. When an •office becomes vacant, and there is no mode provided by the law to fill the vacancy, the governor is to fill it by granting a ■commission. Rev. Stats., par. 3114. A mode for filling vacancies in the board of supervisors is provided in paragraph 388 of the Revised Statutes. Such vacancies are filled by the remaining supervisors and the probate judge, and if there are mo supervisors, then by the probate judge, recorder, and treasurer of the county. The law provides for three supervisors, two of whom are elected for terms of two years, and one for a term of four years, all being elected at the first •election, and the long, or four-years, term being acauired by the candidate receiving the greatest number of votes. Pro
We are of the opinion that or. the death of Stevens a vacancy in the office of supervisor occurred for the remaining-portion of his term,—viz., from March 1, 1893, until January 1, 1897; that the appointment of Finley was for the term-made vacant by Stevens’s death? and that no election of a, successor of Finley can be had until the general election in 1896. The act of defendant in refusing to place plaintiff’s, name on the ballots was right, and the judgment of the district court in favor of defendant is correct, and is-affirmed.
Baker, C. J., and Hawkins, J., concur.