History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sheehan v. Lee
98 N.J.L. 901
N.J.
1923
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heepenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Sheehan v. Lee
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 20, 1923
Citation: 98 N.J.L. 901
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.