Sheehan v. Lee

98 N.J.L. 901 | N.J. | 1923

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heepenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.