Opinion by
George Shearer petitions this Court for review of the back pay allowance provisions of an order of the Secretary of Education which has reinstated him as a teacher with Elizabeth Forward School District. The
Petitioner, a profеssional employee, had been arrested on August 2,1977, and charged with possession of marijuana and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Despite receiving notice of the arrest, the school board toоk no immediate action. However, by letter, an assistant superintendent then notified petitioner that he wаs suspended without salary or benefits effective August 24.
After two hearings, the board discharged petitioner on October 6 for immorality and intemperance. On appeal, the Secretary of Education reversed petitioner’s dismissal for lack of substantial evidence to support the charges.
We perceive three issues:
1. Is petitioner entitlеd to back pay for the period of suspension before the discharge date?
2. Is he entitled to interest on the back pay?
3. Should income reсeived during the back pay period be deducted from the back pay award, specifically (a) unеmployment compensation benefits, and (b) income earned on nights and weekends ?
1. Period of Bach Pay
As to reimbursement of lost salary after a wrongful dismissal, Section 1130 of the Public School Code of 1949
Even though there may be an implied power to suspend pending a discharge hearing, under Kaplan v. School District of Philadelphia,
Nor can this suspension be validated upon any other grounds. Section 1124 of the Public School Code of 1949 specifies the sole grounds upon which a suspension may be based, Cigarski v. Lake Lehman School District,
Thus, petitioner is entitlеd to remuneration from the effective date of that suspension, August 24, 1976.
2. Interest
Petitioner contends that his back pay award should bear interest at the rate of 6%, citing Section 1155 of the Code. The relevant portion of thаt section states: “In the event the payment of salaries of employees of any school district is not made when due, the school district shall be liable for the payment of same, together with interest at six pеrcentum (6%) per auunm from the due date.”
Hence, we are compelled to agree with the petitioner that his back рay award bear 6% simple interest from the dates his salary payments were due between August 24 and the date of his reinstatement.
3. Deductions From Award
Finally, the district argues that certain amounts of money petitioner received while he was separated from his teaсhing position be deducted from the back pay award.
The district is clearly entitled to set off petitionеr’s earnings from other sources against compensation due. Eastern York School District v. Long,
However, income earned by petitioner from jobs held on nights and weekends should not be set off against the back pay award. Petitioner could have held those positions concurrently with his teaching job; thus, they should not be held to diminish further his recompense for wrongful discharge.
The order of the Secretary of Education is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Order
And Now, January 27,1981, the order of the Secretary of Education, No. 40-77, dated September 13,
Notes
Act of March 10, 1949, P.L. 30, as amended, 24 P.S. §11-1130.
Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, added by Section 8 of the Act of July 7, 1977, P.L. 41, P.S. §§864, 865, 43 P.S. §§864, 865.
