38 Ga. App. 269 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1928
1. Several grounds of the motion for a new trial are based upon alleged errors in the instructions to the jury relative to “the doctrine of the fears of a reasonable man acting under the belief
2. Even if there was error in the charge on murder, complained of in the 5th special ground, it was harmless, as the verdict was voluntary manslaughter. Dunwoody v. State, 23 Ga. App. 93 (97 S. E. 561); Thompson v. State, 24 Ga. App. 144 (2) (99 S. E. 891).
3. The 6th ground of the motion complains of the refusal of the court to give certain requested instructions to the jury. This was not error, because, so far as correct and pertinent, the requested instructions were covered by the charge given. Hagood, v. State, 5 Ga. App. 80 (3) (62 S. E. 641); Holcombe v. State, 5 Ga. App. 47 (3 c) (62 S. E. 647).
4. There was some evidence to support the verdict, and for no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.