History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shaw v. State
95 S.E. 477
Ga. Ct. App.
1918
Check Treatment
Bloodworth, J.

1. The entire brief of the attorney for the plaintiff in error- is in the following sentence: “The recitals of fact and statement of error in the motion and amended motion for a new trial clearly state the issues in the case and same is respectfully submitted to the court.” This is not an argument. It has been repeatedly held by this court and the Supreme Court of the State that assignments of error not argued in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error will be treated as abandoned.

2. The evidence demanded the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Barwell, J., eoneur.

Case Details

Case Name: Shaw v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 2, 1918
Citation: 95 S.E. 477
Docket Number: 9530
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.