Shaw v. State
33 S.W. 978 | Tex. Crim. App. | 1896
Appellant was charged with and convicted of betting at dice at a place other than a private residence. The facts show that he threw the dice, took all bets, stood behind the table, and was "one against the many." In other words, he was the dealer; hence the game was a banking game. Bell v. State,
Reversed and Remanded.