History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shaw v. Prestigiacomo
8 A.D.2d 792
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1959
|
Check Treatment

Order so far as appealed from unanimously modified to the extent of limiting the dismissal of the third cause of action to the defendant *793Calarco and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. (See Magonigle Trucking Co. v. Tambini, 302 N. Y. 617.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Babin, M. M. Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Shaw v. Prestigiacomo
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 18, 1959
Citation: 8 A.D.2d 792
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.