History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shaw v. Barr
506 U.S. 1019
SCOTUS
1992
Check Treatment

Appeal from D. C. E. D. N. C. Probable jurisdiction noted. Argument shall be limited to the following question which all parties are directed to brief: “Whether a state legislature’s intent to comply with the Voting Rights Act and the Attorney General’s interpretation thereof precludes a finding that the legislature’s congressional redistricting plan was adopted with in*1020vidious discriminatory intent where the legislature did not accede to the plan suggested by the Attorney General but instead developed its own.”

Case Details

Case Name: Shaw v. Barr
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 7, 1992
Citation: 506 U.S. 1019
Docket Number: No. 92-357
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.