Shaw Funding, L.P. v. Samuel, 101 A.D.3d 1100

The resolution of credibility issues by the hearing court is entitled to deference on appeal, and will be upheld if supported by evidence in the record (see generally Gass v Gass, 42 AD3d 393 [2007]; Ahrens v Chisena, 40 AD3d 787 [2007]; Lattingtown Harbor Prop. Owners Assn., Inc. v Agostino, 34 AD3d 536 [2006]). The hearing record in this case supports the court‘s conclusion that the plaintiff did not effectuate service of the motion for a deficiency judgment upon the respondents (see RPAPL 1371 [2]; First Nationwide Bank v Pegasus Agency, 253 AD2d 536 [1998]), and we discern no basis to disturb that determination.

The plaintiff‘s remaining contentions are without merit. Dillon, J.P., Chambers, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Shaw Funding, L.P. v. Samuel

Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date Published: Dec 26, 2012

Citations: 101 A.D.3d 1100; 955 N.Y.S.2d 896; 2012 NY Slip Op 9042; 955 N.Y.2d 896

Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.