Appeal, No. 289 | Pa. | Oct 23, 1918

Per Curiam,

The three questions set forth in appellants’ statement of the questions involved in this appeal — and we can consider no others — are correctly answered by the learned president judge of the court below in his opinions denying a new trial and overruling the motion for judgment for the defendant n. o. v. On these opinions the judgment on the verdict is affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.