History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sharpsteen ex rel. Sharpsteen v. Keesler
178 So. 2d 623
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1965
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves a negligence action, wherein the appellants-plaintiffs brought an action against the appellees as defendants, as a result of an intersection collision, wherein the appellant, Robert L. Sharp-steen, was a passenger on a motor scooter driven by a third person, not a party to this proceeding. A jury verdict was returned in favor of the defendants.

The only point preserved for review by the appellants is the propriety of certain instructions given by the trial court. No objections to these instructions were made in accordance with.Rule.2.6, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 31 F.S.A. and, therefore, it appears that the final judgment rendered on the jury verdict should be affirmed on the authority of Joe Reinertson, Inc. v. Nelson, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 723; Karl v. David Ritter Sportservice, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 23; Henningsen v. Smith, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 85.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Sharpsteen ex rel. Sharpsteen v. Keesler
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 21, 1965
Citation: 178 So. 2d 623
Docket Number: No. 65-141
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.