History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sharp v. State
2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1823
Mo. Ct. App.
2001
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Rodney Sharp, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24 .0351 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends he did not enter his guilty plea knowingly and voluntarily because the trial court denied a paternity test. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

. All Rule references are to the Missouri Court Rules (2001).

Case Details

Case Name: Sharp v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 16, 2001
Citation: 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1823
Docket Number: No. ED 78701
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.