History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shannon v. Ogletree
202 Ala. 219
Ala.
1918
Check Treatment

On the original hearing in this cause, it was ruled that the bill for sale for division could be maintained by a reversioner against a life tenant who was also a cotenant in reversion.

This ruling was not in harmony with the case of Fies v. Rosser, 162 Ala. 504, 50 So. 287, 136 Am. St. Rep. 57, which has been followed in the later cases of Letcher v. Allen,180 Ala. 254, 60 So. 828, and Jordan v. Walker, 77 So. 838.1 The court prefers to adhere to the rule declared in those cases, and the result is that the rehearing must be granted, and the judgment of the court below must be reversed, and a judgment here rendered sustaining the demurrer to the bill for want of equity.

Rehearing granted.

All concur.

1 201 Ala. 248.

Case Details

Case Name: Shannon v. Ogletree
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jun 30, 1918
Citation: 202 Ala. 219
Docket Number: 2 Div. 651.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.