No. 82-1266 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | May 3, 1983
The trial court’s findings that appellee overcame the presumption of undue influence by coming forward with a reasonable explanation for her active role in the testatrix’s affairs, especially in the preparation of a new will, is supported by competent and substantial evidence and thus, will not be disturbed. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So. 2d 697" date_filed="1971-06-09" court="Fla." case_name="In Re Estate of Carpenter">253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971); In re Estate of Blakey, 363 So. 2d 630" date_filed="1978-10-31" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Hodges v. Flagship First National Bank">363 So.2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
Affirmed.