Shamas v. Ritter, 432 So. 2d 128

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s findings that appellee overcame the presumption of undue influence by coming forward with a reasonable explanation for her active role in the testatrix’s affairs, especially in the preparation of a new will, is supported by competent and substantial evidence and thus, will not be disturbed. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971); In re Estate of Blakey, 363 So.2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Shamas v. Ritter

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: May 3, 1983

Citations: 432 So. 2d 128; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27719; No. 82-1266

Docket Number: No. 82-1266

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.