History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shallcross v. Mawhinney
8 Sadler 142
Pa.
1887
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The mere refusal to fulfil an agreement to purchase land for another is nothing more than the violation of a parol agreement, and equity will not decree the purchaser to he a trustee. This case however goes further. The land was owned by Mawhinney. It was about to be sold. He applied to the plaintiff in error for counsel and assistance, who advised him to let the sale go on and he would buy the property for him. Mawhinney relied npon this promise and did not hid himself or get any third person to bid for him, but permitted the plaintiff in error to buy it under the arrangement. In now repudiating the agreement after he acquired the land for a nominal sum, he must he held to he a trustee ex maleficio for the former owner. McCaskey v. Graff, 23 Pa. 321, 62 Am. Dec. 336; Boynton v. Housler, 73 Pa. 453.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Shallcross v. Mawhinney
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 31, 1887
Citation: 8 Sadler 142
Docket Number: No. 260, E. D.
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.