Shain v. State, 872 S.W.2d 573

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by summary order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

Case Details

Case Name: Shain v. State

Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals

Date Published: Feb 15, 1994

Citations: 872 S.W.2d 573; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 263; 1994 WL 41376; No. 64408

Docket Number: No. 64408

Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.