Shah v. Wilco Systems, Inc.Shah v. Wilco Systems, Inc.
At the close of a private mediation, counsel for the parties executed an agreement which provided, in part, that they had “fully and completely resolved the dispute” and released one another from any and all claims, and that the agreement was “final and binding,” and “enforceable in any court of law of general jurisdiction.” Plaintiff also agreed to execute a confidentiality agreement and an “agreement not to seek future employment with Wilco and its affiliated companies.”
The motion court correctly found that the mediation agreement is a valid settlement agreement, with no basis to invalidate it. It is in writing and executed (see
Furthermore, it was an appropriate exercise of discretion for the court to clarify the term “affiliate” by referencing a statutory definition of that term (see Matter of 166 Mamaroneck Ave. Corp. v 151 E. Post Rd. Corp., 78 NY2d 88, 91-92 [1991]).
We have considered plaintiff‘s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Freedman and Richter, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 32391(U).]