History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sexton v. State
127 So. 499
Ala.
1930
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

BOULDIN, J.

Petition of Cabe Sexton for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review'and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Sexton v. State, 127 So. 497.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur.





Addendum

On Rehearing.

BOULDIN, J.

Petitioner insists on rehearing that the case of Casey v. State, 19 Ala. App. 317, 97 So. 165, followed by the Court of Appeals in the present case, is not supported by Hardeman v. State, 202 Ala. 694, 81 So. 656.

Be this as it may, the decision in Casey v. State, supra, upon the point to which it is cited is correct. Hughes v. State, 11 Ala. App. 307, 66 So. 844, and cases there cited; 16 C. J. 1282.

Application for rehearing overruled.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Sexton v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 16, 1930
Citation: 127 So. 499
Docket Number: 3 Div. 912.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.