History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sewell v. Douberly
156 S.E.2d 528
Ga. Ct. App.
1967
Check Treatment
Bell, Presiding Judge.

In this suit to recover for personal injuries caused by defendant’s negligence in the operation of an automobile, plaintiff’s petition showed that plaintiff was a guest passenger, that defendant had stopped the vehicle in order to discharge plaintiff and had left the motor running, that plaintiff had stepped to the ground and that while plaintiff was reaching back into the vehicle to remove her package a third person inside the vehicle struck the gear shift, engaging the automobile in reverse gear and causing it to lurch backward and knock plaintiff to the ground. Held:

As plaintiff was still in process of alighting from the vehicle when she was injured, the guest passenger relationship had not terminated. Where plaintiff did not expressly allege gross negligence, but charged merely that defendant’s conduct was ordinary negligence, and the facts alleged did not demand the inference of gross negligence, it was not error to sustain defendant’s general demurrer to the petition. Townsend v. Minge, 44 Ga. App. 453 (161 SE 661); Capers v. Martin, 54 Ga. App. 555 (5) (188 SE 465); Wilder v. Steel Products Co., 57 Ga. App. 255, 257 (195 SE 226); Perry v. Poss, 86 Ga. App. 169, 173 (71 SE2d 283); McBee v. Williamson, 96 Ga. App. 859 (3) (101 SE2d 910).

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell and Joslin, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Sewell v. Douberly
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 23, 1967
Citation: 156 S.E.2d 528
Docket Number: 42831
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.