Case Information
*1 Case 2:22-cv-00938-GJP Document 6 Filed 04/12/22 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: NENNEH SESAY, : CIVIL ACTION NOS.
Plaintiff . : 22-CV-0082
: 22-CV-0083 : 22-CV-0119 : 22-CV-0934 : 22-CV-0936 : 22-CV-0938 : 22-CV-0939 : 22-CV-1026 : 22-CV-1061 : 22-CV-1062 : 22-CV-1067 : 22-CV-1068 : 22-CV-1069 : 22-CV-1158 : 22-CV-1254 :
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2022, upon consideration of Plaintiff Nenneh Sesay’s Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Complaints in Civil Action Nos. 22- 0082, 22-0083, 22-0119, 22-0934, 22-0936, 22-0938, 22-0939, 22-1026, 22-1061, 22-1062, 22-1067, 22-1068, 22-1069, 22-1158, and 22-1254, and consistent with the accompanying Memorandum of Law, it is ORDERED that:
1. Sesay is GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in Civil Action Nos. 22-0082, 22-0083, 22-0119, 22-0934, 22-0936, 22- 0938, 22-0939, 22-1026, 22-1061, 22-1062, 22-1067, 22-1068, 22-1069, 22-1158, and 22- 1254.
2. The Complaints in Civil Action Nos. 22-0082, 22-0083, 22-0119, 22-0934, 22-0936, 22-0938, 22-0939, 22-1026, 22-1061, 22-1062, 22-1067, 22-1068, 22-1069, 22- 1158, and 22-1254 are DEEMED filed.
Case 2:22-cv-00938-GJP Document 6 Filed 04/12/22 Page 2 of 2 3. The Complaints in Civil Action Nos. 22-0082, 22-0083, 22-0119, 22-0934, 22-0936, 22-0938, 22-0939, 22-1026, 22-1061, 22-1062, 22-1067, 22-1068, 22-1069, 22- 1158, and 22-1254 are DISMISSED for the reasons discussed in the Court ’s Memorandum. Sesay may not amend her complaint in these cases as amendment would be futile. All of Sesay’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the exception of any state law claims dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, which are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Sesay’s right to file these claims in an appropriate state court.
3. Sesay’s Motions requesting to see the Judge and obtain a cash settlement (ECF 4, Civ. A. No. 22-0934); (ECF 3, Civ. A. No. 22-0936); (ECF 3, Civ. A. No. 22- 0938); (ECF 3, Civ. A. No. 22-0939); and (ECF 3, Civ. A. No. 22-1254) are DENIED AS MOOT .
4. If Sesay files any more groundless complaints, the Court will consider the appropriateness of an injunction barring her from filing new civil actions on an in forma pauperis basis in the future.
5. The Court certifies that any appeal from this Order is not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A).
6. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE these cases. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J. 2