History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sensormatic Security Corp. v. Sensormatic Electronics Corp.
97 F.R.D. 725
D.D.C.
1983
Check Treatment

ORDER

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

Upon consideration of plaintiff’s memorandum to show cause, and the entire record herein, it is, by the Court, this 5th day of May, 1983,

ORDERED, that defendant shall have until May 15, 1983 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Counsel are reminded that it is for the Court, not the parties, to grant extensions of time in cases pending before it.

Case Details

Case Name: Sensormatic Security Corp. v. Sensormatic Electronics Corp.
Court Name: District Court, District of Columbia
Date Published: May 5, 1983
Citation: 97 F.R.D. 725
Docket Number: Civ. A. No. 83-952
Court Abbreviation: D.D.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.