History
  • No items yet
midpage
95 So. 3d 398
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2012
PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final summary judgment entered in this contract action, as the ap-pellee failed to conclusively negate the affirmative defenses raised by appellant. See Corya v. Sanders, 76 So.3d 31, 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Riverwood Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Litecrete, Inc., 69 So.3d 983, 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). Moreover, the appel-lee relied in its affidavit in support of summary judgment on a contract (order form) which was never mentioned or relied upon as part of the contract in its complaint. At the very least, it raises a material issue of fact as to what constituted the contract between the parties. See, e.g., Grumman Ecosystems Corp. v. Palm Beach Cnty., 391 So.2d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

WARNER, POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Senft v. Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 1, 2012
Citations: 95 So. 3d 398; 2012 WL 3101405; No. 4D11-712
Docket Number: No. 4D11-712
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In