Selletti v. LiottiSelletti v. Liotti
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant‘s motion violated the rule against successive motions for summary judgment (see Williams v City of White Plains, 6 AD3d 609 [2004]; Capuano v Platzner Intl. Group, 5 AD3d 620, 621 [2004]; Klein v Auerbach, 1 AD3d 317, 318 [2003]; Davidson Metals Corp. v Marlo Dev. Co., 262 AD2d 599 [1999]; Laxrand Constr. Corp. v R.S.C.A. Realty Corp., 135 AD2d 685, 686 [1987]).
We find no basis to award sanctions at this time.
Spolzino, J.P., Krausman, Carni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.