History
  • No items yet
midpage
Select Furniture Co. v. Kearns
12 Pa. D. & C. 604
| Pennsylvania Court of Common P... | 1929
|
Check Treatment
Martin, J.,

This is an action of replevin. The defendant has filed a petition, praying that the goods in controversy be permitted to remain in his custody and possession pending the trial of the case. A rule to show cause was issued upon this petition. The reason assigned is that the defendant is unable to secure a counter-bond.

No authority has been cited to us which authorizes this procedure. If the action was improperly brought, the defendant has his remedy against the plaintiff and its surety on the replevin bond. The rule to show cause why the defendant should not retain custody of the property will be discharged.

Prom William J. Aiken, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Case Details

Case Name: Select Furniture Co. v. Kearns
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County
Date Published: Jan 5, 1929
Citation: 12 Pa. D. & C. 604
Docket Number: No. 1740
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.