History
  • No items yet
midpage
Selbach v. United States
78 F. 803
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1897
Check Treatment
TOWNSEND, District Judge

(orally). The merchandise In question is anthracene or alizarine yellow, claimed to be free, as alizarine, *804natural or artificial, under paragraph 595 of the tariff act of March 3, 1885, hut assessed for duty under paragraph 82 of said act as a coal-tar color or dye, by whatever name known, not specially provided for. That this article is not chemically alizarine seems to be immaterial. The evidence is undisputed that it responds to the alizarine tests, and was commercially known and dealt in as “aliz-arine” or “alizarine yellow” at the time of the passage of said act. The decision of the board of general appraisers affirming the action of the collector is reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Selbach v. United States
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Date Published: Feb 18, 1897
Citation: 78 F. 803
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.